The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNK · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CNVS · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RDI | CNK | AREN | CNVS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 | 30 (highest) | 29 | 29 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 80 (highest) | 35 | 33 |
| Pricing power | 39 (highest) | — | 37 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 24 (highest) | 0 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 31 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 51 (highest) | 14 | 44 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $32.8M | Not reported | $39M | $55M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |