The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RDVT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CAST · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RDVT | CAST | ATKR | PUBM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 54 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 (highest) | 50 | 19 | 46 |
| Pricing power | — | 70 | 25 | 96 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 4 | — | 88 (highest) | 30 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 55 | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 43 | 40 | 44 (highest) |
| 475% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 52% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 163% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.0B | $38.7M | $3.2B | $782M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |