The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RDVT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
TTEC · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RDVT | RBA | TTAN | TTEC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 77 | 91 (highest) | 63 | 51 |
| Pricing power | — | 32 | 93 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 41 | 0 | 93 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 32 | 55 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 33 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 416% above high estimate | 197% above high estimate | No price data | 78% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $940.9M | $20.6B | $7.3B | $100.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |