The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

REBN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CAVA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ODRS · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HCKT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureREBNCAVAODRSHCKT
Moat Score (0–100)53 (highest)53 (highest)53 (highest)53 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend6580 (highest)7045
Pricing power100 (highest)117045
Returns on capital03397 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55100 (highest)2857
Capital allocation44 (highest)4044 (highest)20
No price data4780% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$7.8M$7.2BNot reportedNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025