The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RJET · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RELL | TEX | IVFH | RJET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 36 | 71 | 44 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 56 (highest) | 30 | 39 | — |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 85 (highest) | 37 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 29 | 100 (highest) | 13 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 29 | 24 | 80 (highest) |
| No price data | 74% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 2% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $5.8B | $8.2M | $733M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |