The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RELY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LDSN · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RELY | BL | LDSN | SSTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 80 (highest) | — | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 70 | 85 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 0 | 18 (highest) | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 75 (highest) | 29 | 55 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | 183% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $5.6B | $2.0B | $450773 | $77.7M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 |