The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

RENT · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GTCH · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

LMMY · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BWMG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureRENTGTCHLMMYBWMG
Moat Score (0–100)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend80 (highest)202065
Pricing power061 (highest)035
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety282878 (highest)28
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)2424
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market capNot reported$2M$3.4M$2.7M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025