The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
REPX · Materials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | REPX | AMPY | ETD | AXIL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 | 56 (highest) | 55 | 55 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 40 | 15 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 95 | 80 |
| Returns on capital | 55 (highest) | 16 | 40 | 18 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 47 | 100 (highest) | 73 | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 24 | 53 (highest) | 24 |
| 27% below value if growth stopped today | 59% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 27% below value if growth stopped today | 106% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $910M | $199M | $572M | $42.5M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |