The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

REX · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CLB · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SLVM · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SD · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureREXCLBSLVMSD
Moat Score (0–100)5455 (highest)5454
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend6181 (highest)4431
Pricing power036 (highest)——
Returns on capital—4291 (highest)34
Balance-sheet safety784642100 (highest)
Capital allocation76 (highest)674049
89% above value if growth stopped today25% above value if growth stopped today54% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)33% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$1.4B$461M$1.3B$525M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025