The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

RGEN · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

INTT · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

PBYI · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BICX · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureRGENINTTPBYIBICX
Moat Score (0–100)5051 (highest)51 (highest)50
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend40505560 (highest)
Pricing power857695 (highest)70
Returns on capital1144 (highest)14
Balance-sheet safety565564 (highest)28
Capital allocation60 (highest)282444
542% above value if growth stopped today64% above value if growth stopped today10% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$7.4B$172M$402M$7.3M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025