The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

RGS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BBXIB · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VSTD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DXLG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureRGSBBXIBVSTDDXLG
Moat Score (0–100)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend405070 (highest)18
Pricing power68
Returns on capital50012 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28282855 (highest)
Capital allocation69 (highest)644424
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$68.2M$58.8MNot reportedNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2024FY2024FY2026