The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RGS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RGS | FNKO | SDOT | PRTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 | 19 | 57 (highest) | 22 |
| Pricing power | — | 58 (highest) | 0 | 52 |
| Returns on capital | 10 | 14 (highest) | 5 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 29 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| 27% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $71.4M | $311M | $19.5M | $640M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |