The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FCCN · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RHI | NUTX | FCCN | IMMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 63 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 11 | 90 (highest) | 85 | 57 |
| Pricing power | 69 | 40 | 70 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 97 (highest) | 83 | — | 81 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 81 | 55 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| 23% below value if growth stopped today | 35% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 40% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $3.6B | $1.0B | $441M | $216M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |