The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CME · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GCMG · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RHLD | CME | GCMG | CBOE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 71 | 75 (highest) | 72 | 70 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 97 (highest) | 72 | 91 |
| Pricing power | 88 (highest) | — | — | 53 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 24 | 88 | 46 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 75 | 100 (highest) | 46 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 77 | 80 (highest) | 60 |
| No price data | No price data | 928% above value if growth stopped today | 240% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | Not reported | $2.6B | $31.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |