The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WTI · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FANG · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RIG | WTI | ASPI | FANG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 25 | 50 | 50 |
| Pricing power | 44 (highest) | — | 27 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 59 (highest) | 0 | 18 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 10 | 55 (highest) | 32 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 31 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 67% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $5.9B | Not reported | $432M | $58.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |