The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RITE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OVV · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RITE | OVV | FTK | CMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 35 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 25 | 80 (highest) | 49 |
| Pricing power | 62 (highest) | — | 0 | 8 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 44 (highest) | 8 | 27 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 36 | 46 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 37 | 44 (highest) | 19 |
| No price data | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 567% above value if growth stopped today | 54% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $13M | $16.0B | $779M | $209M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |