The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RJET · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ALGT · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RJET | IVFH | SCSC | ALGT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 44 | 63 | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 39 (highest) | 25 | — |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 37 | 10 | 80 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 13 | 100 (highest) | 75 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 24 | 70 | 26 |
| 10% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 14% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $790M | $14.2M | $1.2B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |