The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
COPR · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VYST · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RKDA | LXFR | COPR | VYST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 36 (highest) | — | 13 |
| Pricing power | 37 | 33 | 86 (highest) | 51 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 24 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 57 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 21 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 122% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $878797 | $454M | $36.7M | $3.2M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |