The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SHW · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RL | SHW | YETI | YELP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 88 | 89 (highest) | 89 (highest) | 87 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 89 | 89 | 61 | 98 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 95 | 74 | 85 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 90 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 38 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 | 91 | 96 | 100 (highest) |
| 209% above value if growth stopped today | 214% above value if growth stopped today | 60% above value if growth stopped today | 4% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $24.4B | $83.5B | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |