The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PNXP · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RNG | BILL | PNXP | OOMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 47 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 65 | 20 | 73 |
| Pricing power | 99 | 97 | 91 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 4 (highest) | 0 | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 10 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 49 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $4.2B | Not reported | $540M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |