The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TKLS · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RNGE | WTER | TKLS | CCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 60 | 60 | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 24 | 33 | 0 | 35 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 0 | — | 15 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 10 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 17 |
| 577% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $77.5M | $390210 | $63.2M | $32.6B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 |