The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RPD · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RPD | DGII | INOD | ATEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 92 (highest) | 80 | 38 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 81 | 66 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 14 | 74 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 51 | 100 (highest) | 37 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 60 (highest) | 24 | 33 |
| No price data | 328% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 370% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $625M | $2.5B | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |