The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RRR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FLY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HNST · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | RRR | FLY | HNST | WYGC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 44 | 60 (highest) | 56 | 56 |
| Pricing power | — | 7 | 51 | 70 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 52 (highest) | — | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 2 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 67 (highest) | 44 | 44 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 219% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $6.7B | $3.1B | $436.6M | $13.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |