The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

RRR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SCI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

IMKTA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ACI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureRRRSCIIMKTAACI
Moat Score (0–100)47 (highest)47 (highest)47 (highest)47 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend66 (highest)4742
Pricing power384350 (highest)
Returns on capital52 (highest)442850
Balance-sheet safety2556 (highest)9
Capital allocation67100 (highest)5981
214% above value if growth stopped today91% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price dataNo price data
Market cap$6.6B$11.5BNot reportedNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026