The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INSW · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RS | SITE | CR | INSW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 26 | 56 | 48 | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 51 | 58 | 63 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 42 | 42 | 62 (highest) | 14 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 68 | 58 | 81 (highest) | 58 |
| Capital allocation | 85 (highest) | 58 | 18 | 80 |
| 42% above value if growth stopped today | 75% above value if growth stopped today | 188% above value if growth stopped today | 36% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $21.1B | $4.0B | $11.8B | $5.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |