The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RSI · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ACEL · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RSI | ACEL | IDT | GLXZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 70 | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 69 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 90 (highest) | 73 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 54 | — | 22 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 62 | 95 | 97 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 100 (highest) | 13 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 60 | 65 | 77 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 176% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 319% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $2.0B | $40.6M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |