The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RSRV · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
REPX · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RSRV | REPX | AXIL | CLB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 75 | 80 | 81 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 90 (highest) | — | 80 | 36 |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 55 (highest) | 18 | 42 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 (highest) | 47 | 73 (highest) | 46 |
| Capital allocation | 52 | 44 | 24 | 67 (highest) |
| 55% above value if growth stopped today | 18% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 82% above value if growth stopped today | 23% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $34.3M | $1.0B | $37.5M | $451M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |