The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EVGO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RTB | SG | EVGO | HZO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 32 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 36 |
| Pricing power | 44 (highest) | — | 0 | 39 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | — | 23 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 44 | 64 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 35% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $16.1M | Not reported | Not reported | $794M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |