The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SIG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
TXT · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RTX | SIG | TXT | GIII |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 92 (highest) | 23 | 84 | 38 |
| Pricing power | 81 (highest) | 62 | 24 | 59 |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 79 (highest) | — | 42 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 69 | 100 (highest) | 78 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 56 | 40 | 57 | 63 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 17% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 2% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | Not reported | $3.7B | $16.7B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |