The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TXT · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ODC · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RTX | TXT | ODC | GIII |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 92 (highest) | 84 | — | 38 |
| Pricing power | 81 (highest) | 24 | 35 | 59 |
| Returns on capital | 4 | — | 58 (highest) | 42 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 69 | 78 | 73 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 56 | 57 | 77 (highest) | 63 |
| No price data | 30% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $13.1B | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |