The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FTAI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | S | TTMI | GRPN | FTAI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 83 (highest) | 20 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 92 (highest) | 29 | 70 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 42 | 83 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 37 | 39 | 19 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | 1199% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 817% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $6.0B | $13.6B | $1.1B | $22.2B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |