The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SAIA · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SAIA | CW | CMI | ECG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 76 | 77 (highest) | 76 | 76 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 73 | 98 | 85 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 64 (highest) | 45 | 25 |
| Returns on capital | 66 | 57 | 96 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 97 (highest) | 76 | 69 | 76 |
| Capital allocation | 70 | 90 (highest) | 87 | 80 |
| 186% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 484% above value if growth stopped today | 279% above value if growth stopped today | 325% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $11.3B | $27.7B | $91.8B | $6.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |