The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SAIL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SAIL | RSKIA | WU | DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 81 | 50 | 90 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 99 | 80 | 64 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 17 | 100 (highest) | 8 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 73 (highest) | 39 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 73 (highest) | 71 | 52 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 24% above high estimate | 75% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 51% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $8.6B | $161.0M | $2.7B | $1.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |