The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SARO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SPWH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OPLN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AIXN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSAROSPWHOPLNAIXN
Moat Score (0–100)42 (highest)42 (highest)42 (highest)41
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend78 (highest)55520
Pricing power285674 (highest)
Returns on capital1982 (highest)9
Balance-sheet safety22058 (highest)28
Capital allocation6064 (highest)4444
620% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data147% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$9.6B$42M$4.2B$6.5M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025