The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SPWH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
OPLN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AIXN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SARO | SPWH | OPLN | AIXN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 41 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 (highest) | 5 | 55 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 28 | 56 | — | 74 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 19 | 82 (highest) | 9 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 22 | 0 | 58 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 64 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| 435% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 133% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $7.1B | $39.4M | $3.9B | $6.5M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |