The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SCI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
BLPG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
IMKTA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SCI | MAMO | BLPG | IMKTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 47 | 20 | 53 (highest) | — |
| Pricing power | 38 | 40 | 64 (highest) | 43 |
| Returns on capital | 44 | 91 (highest) | — | 28 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 5 | 73 (highest) | 28 | 56 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 12 | 44 | 59 |
| 87% above value if growth stopped today | 18% above value if growth stopped today | 90% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $11.3B | $38.7M | $354756 | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 |