The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
JBLU · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SCWO | JBLU | CAPS | WS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 60 (highest) | 20 | 17 |
| Pricing power | 0 | — | 34 (highest) | 17 |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 7 | 9 | 36 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 0 | 28 | 26 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 18 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 35% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $53.7M | $1.6B | $1.5M | $1.7B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |