The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SD · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

REX · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CMPR · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CPRI · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureSDREXCMPRCPRI
Moat Score (0–100)54 (highest)54 (highest)54 (highest)54 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend316169 (highest)15
Pricing power08099 (highest)
Returns on capital342836 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)784977
Capital allocation4976 (highest)4040
35% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)102% above value if growth stopped today221% above value if growth stopped today18% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$509M$1.5B$2.4B$1.8B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2026