The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SEZL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SEZL | DSNY | LOGI | ADI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 39 | 51 | 84 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 99 (highest) | 63 | 97 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 78 | 100 (highest) | 34 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 54 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 56 |
| Capital allocation | 32 | 64 (highest) | 20 | 60 |
| 4832% above value if growth stopped today | 11% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 367% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $4.3B | $4.1M | Not reported | $193.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |