The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LVLU · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | SG | GO | MNTS | LVLU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 33 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 62 (highest) | 58 | 46 | 15 |
| Pricing power | — | 54 | 70 | 73 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 6 | 0 | 7 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 32% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $910.9M | — | $49.4M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |