The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LVLU · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | SG | LVLU | MNTS | MCFT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 15 | 45 | 15 |
| Pricing power | — | 73 (highest) | 70 | 36 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 7 | 0 | 86 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 0 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 454% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $45.5M | Not reported | $480M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |