The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SGA · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GOGO · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
STUB · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SGA | LILA | GOGO | STUB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 31 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 29 | 36 | 55 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | — | 100 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 8 | 0 | 52 (highest) | 12 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 36 | 28 | 24 | 37 (highest) |
| 47% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | 50% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1081% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $54.6M | $1.5B | $512M | $2.6B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |