The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SHAK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SIG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
CBRL · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
| Measure | SHAK | SBUX | SIG | CBRL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 69 (highest) | 69 (highest) | 69 (highest) | 69 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 88 (highest) | 81 | 65 | 53 |
| Pricing power | — | 97 | 62 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 100 (highest) | 79 | 90 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 26 | 100 (highest) | 65 |
| Capital discipline | 80 (highest) | 42 | 40 | 34 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 76% above high estimate | 18% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 8% above high estimate |
| Market cap | — | $119.2B | $3.7B | $1.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |