The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SHC · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

XTNT · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CPIX · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GEHC · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureSHCXTNTCPIXGEHC
Moat Score (0–100)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5175 (highest)4754
Pricing power929698 (highest)70
Returns on capital120063 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)41
Capital allocation442448 (highest)21
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market capNot reported$60M$98.9MNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025