The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SIBN · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

KEQU · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BBIO · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ZLAB · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureSIBNKEQUBBIOZLAB
Moat Score (0–100)49 (highest)49 (highest)49 (highest)49 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend70 (highest)70 (highest)5570 (highest)
Pricing power97 (highest)99197 (highest)
Returns on capital048 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)2855 (highest)
Capital allocation2466 (highest)2424
No price data22% below value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$725M$103M$16.4B$21.3B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025