The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SIEB · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SAMG · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ZSQR · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SNEX · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSIEBSAMGZSQRSNEX
Moat Score (0–100)5153 (highest)5250
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend22337071 (highest)
Pricing power——92 (highest)70
Returns on capital56100 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)7355—
Capital allocation2454460 (highest)
13% below value if growth stopped today30% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data11% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$67.1M$93.3M$23.2M$3.0B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025