The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CMCSA · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
NMAX · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SIRI | CMCSA | NMAX | CALX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 51 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 69 | 78 (highest) | 70 | 50 |
| Pricing power | 62 | — | 64 | 72 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 82 (highest) | 20 | — | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 3 | 28 | 28 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 79 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| 12% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 642% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $10.0B | Not reported | $812M | $2.4B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |