The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SIX · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ADEA · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CPHC · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CCZ · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSIXADEACPHCCCZ
Moat Score (0–100)5254 (highest)5252
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend23612978 (highest)
Pricing power100———
Returns on capital99 (highest)555620
Balance-sheet safety041100 (highest)28
Capital allocation39592479 (highest)
138% above value if growth stopped today5% above value if growth stopped today3% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$2.7B$1.8B$80.7MNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2023FY2025FY2025FY2025