The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SLE · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EFX · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SLE | EFX | DHX | DJT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 55 (highest) | 28 | 43 |
| Pricing power | 55 | — | 100 (highest) | 77 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 19 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 26 | 0 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 54 | 64 (highest) | 44 |
| No price data | 144% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 341% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3M | $20.8B | $171M | $2.4B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |