The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SLE · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

QNST · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DHX · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DJT · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureSLEQNSTDHXDJT
Moat Score (0–100)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend—80 (highest)2843
Pricing power5511100 (highest)77
Returns on capital07 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety5570 (highest)028
Capital allocation442464 (highest)44
No price data834% above value if growth stopped today472% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$5.3M$920M$222M$2.0B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025