The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FCCN · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SMCI | NUTX | FCCN | RHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 63 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 90 | 85 | 11 |
| Pricing power | 16 | 40 | 70 (highest) | 69 |
| Returns on capital | 60 | 83 | — | 97 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 86 | 81 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 40 |
| 98% above value if growth stopped today | 86% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 25% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $23.0B | $1.4B | $230M | $3.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |